Mankind tested with many guiding ideologies to derive conclusions on how to fix rules and norms to structure, regulate, and hold people accountable for actions.

There are many guiding ideologies that humanity could adopt to promote social progress and improve living standards while ensuring greater freedom. However, mankind tested many ideologies to pick the right method to control and regulate the actions that man exercises in the natural world. Most people are ready to endorse that the idealism that Woodrow Wilson proposed in 1918 and/or the one that Franklin D. Roosevelt enunciated in 1941 are the most practical ideals to ensure a lasting peace or a transparent distribution of power dynamics.

In the aftermath of the Second World War, humankind created an intergovernmental organization, which they named the United Nations, to provide a forum for resolving international disputes and administer the postwar international system that was outlined.

This council failed to prevent conflicts between nations and make future wars impossible so far.

No person can tell with certainty if this wave of insecurity that is sweeping the world as of 1945 is due to the United Nations lacking a complete understanding of what social change in the social order mankind is supposed to derive from the intervention of this council or if other syntheses emerged after the Second World War, thus making people become less tolerant.

Throughout history, humankind allowed their combined aptitude to imagine and explore contrast with exegeses that claimed the universe was based on something objective. Man’s aptitude to be “the measure of all things” helped humankind to believe that a vision for the future can be captured in parallel to the prophecies reported in religion. The aptitude of mankind to imagine plus our curiosity to reverse the dissolution of human life are ample reasons to enlist the entire human family to accept the challenge to push the boundaries of our philosophical and scientific capabilities to the limit. The concept of progress has provided numerous benefits to various societies for centuries.

Human reason consents voluntarily or by virtue of a system of governance. Religion served human reason until 1945 by dividing reality into two realms and promoting the idea that it is essential to orient one’s reasoning towards generosity in the physical realm. In other words, promoting an ideology that aims at distancing the human body from being required to alter matter.

As of 1945, the people who are determining and enforcing the policies that mankind willingly agreed to militate in favor of at this global council to prevent future wars are relying on methods that are the total opposite of what religion uses as central guiding ideology to arrive at political and ethical truths. The council wants people to begin prioritizing the acquisition of matter.

After seventy-two years of practicing policies that aim at conditioning human reason to be dedicated to seizing matter as an end to arrive at political and ethical truths. There is no sign so far to buttress that practicing this philosophical method, which the United Nations has been militating in favor of as of 1945, is achieving practical results for the greater well-being of society.

In effect, some empirical evidence tends to support that when the United Nations allowed the human reason to be entitled to seize. Instead of human reason starting to practice tolerance to prevail over the weakness of the will. Human reason is using this opportunity that the United Nations facilitated plus breakthroughs in health science aimed at extending longevity so an individual can realize the full development of one’s own personality much more vigorously.

The implication of the United Nations allowing human reason to be doing the total opposite of what religion preaches wouldn’t have been a concern if it wasn’t for this other challenge compounding.

All that humans spend their lives doing from birth to death is alter matter. As of 1945, in addition to the United Nations preaching to people to solidify the idea of seizing. This council is promoting initiatives that encourage man to delegate the job the human body was programmed to be fulfilling in nature to humanoids and machinery.

It has not been proven if delegating the actions that the human body was programmed to be doing in matter to humanoids and machinery helps humans to make future wars impossible. However, of all the people who lived, Christ would be thrilled to know that finally humankind is practicing his philosophy of giving. Humans created an intergovernmental organization whom they tasked with preparing people to accelerate the delegation of the role that the human body was created to fulfill in nature to humanoids and machines so such machinery could accomplish this function on behalf of the human body.

Is the United Nations practicing Catholicism unknowingly? This action of tasking the job to unnaturally change matter to machinery to effect what living organism (i.e., another human) was tasked to be doing stops humans from exercising changes in matter. In effect, this phenomenon stops people from becoming dedicated to seizing as they wanted to start living, doing as of 1945.

Humans are a species that depends on food to stay alive. When Christ was preaching to people to give all their possessions if they wanted to win eternal life, this was going to force the person who would take him up on his offer to start to alter matter using the natural tools that the human body was programmed with to provide to this body mass to stay alive. This action was going to make the human body involuntarily develop the knowledge or know-how to survive.

It has never come to pass that an organism or any civilization delegated the role its body was programmed to serve in the natural world to machinery as per what people started doing after 1945 more and more, to know if humans will manage in this latest test to spot how to maintain international order. Likewise, when mankind swaps the knowledge the human reason needs to provide to the human body from being one that this aptitude gains artificially to letting this function be left to the human body to exercise in real time, especially since all that mankind does on earth is to provide to the body and reproduce.

Mankind has been changing everything that is external to us. Until now we have remained the same. We know that two outcomes will emerge from the efforts sponsored by the United Nations to have humans relinquish the roles that the human body was programmed to fill in favor of machinery. Either this program will start to make human imaginations more responsive to achieving practical results for the greater well-being of society, or the United Nations is setting up mankind to confront another third world war. For now, we can only wait until humanoids and machinery become more integrated into our lives and hope for the best.