Humans believe that because they are programmed with aptitudes that differentiate them from other species that cohabit with them on earth that their inherent mental power could be employed to create patterns that should serve a different purpose for all of them. From antiquity until now, the social realm has remained an experimental theater for people to come up with a social contract that guarantees for each member the right to liberty and happiness.

During Greek Antiquity, our ancestors decided to take all the gods, goddesses, demigods, and mythological creatures that people were depending on to deepen greed and arrogance and replace them with a single all-powerful god. This move aimed to address allegations that people claimed to have been empowered by a deity to control and dominate others. In so doing, our ancestors changed a complex religious system into a simpler one. However, this conjecture seems to have produced a challenge that is much more complex. People began to interpret that they were created based on the image of God. This made the number of gods on earth who interfere to get their way equal to the number of living people. Moreover, to begin to resize each other up by weighing their actions based on distinction embedded in race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth, or other status.

In 1776 during the American Independence War, the people who revolted against the British Crown penned that “all humans are created equal.” Those separatists successfully established a culture that helped the United States transform from a nation facing numerous challenges in 1776 into a superpower by 1945.

The feats that the United States was known for from 1776 to 1945 were different from how other human societies in other parts of the world were living. In all the other nations, human societies were denying each other freedom. The social contract that they were upholding was based on a political philosophy that was advocating that human societies are hierarchical and not equal.

In 1941, the United States used its power to push the Western European nations that were colonizing many countries worldwide to end this practice so every member of the human family could live free from fear and want.

Humans can only harmonize ethical relations using philosophies that structure relationships on respect for equal rights and self-determination, and in 1945, mankind began to program relations on this principle.

From 1945 to now, people are not able to harmonize actions without relying on their distinction; thus, they seem to be dragging the complex system that existed before WW2. The social system that has emerged so far seems no different from the one that existed before 1945.

“Progressive Regression: Thoughts on how the socio-cultural patterns that emerged post WW2 are a regression to reconstruct the in-bound world events in reverse order” is a book that examines how the behaviors that emerged since 1945 could be aligning mankind on a reverse track to reconstruct the in-bound events that our predecessors experienced until the regression that our successors would know would bring them back to primitive days. Evidently, the first rendezvous would be a global war date that resembles the one that our predecessors fought during WW1, unless the UN and all development aid pause from continuing to interfere in the social order to deepen corruption and insecurity.

The book looks into how the decision of the political leaders who succeeded the founding fathers of the UN to adopt the culture that the United States followed to make its citizens happy and to approve the UN becoming an economic operator to accelerate the creation of improved labour standards and social security for all the members of the human family could be what is preventing people from not being able to put up with one another to make progress on the ends stipulated in the UN Charter.

The book tries to show how having UN agents who are providing economic solutions while enjoying privileges and immunities, and while they are working on realizing the full development of their personality, unlike how the people who in religion devote their lives to the service of God and humanity accept to choose death to self and to the world, could be aligning mankind on an eventual rendezvous with a global war if this organization is not paused from interfering in the social order to deepen corruption and insecurity.

The book tries to show how the UN is not domesticating people to have the courage to accept the second best when the first best is unattainable, as per what the founding fathers of the UN suggested, but a philosophy that keeps the world dynamic because it teaches people to convert legal rights into becoming an interest right instead of remaining a will right when one improves his own chances.

Most importantly, the book tries to show that the decision of the UN member states to have the UN become an economic operator could be the biggest threat to the rich. The work tries to show that humans have no choice but to begin to empty out from the social realm the philosophical ideas that are making people depend on tribalism to get their way, to stop the UN from instigating violence. The work tries to also show that the United Nations could make the rich surrender in the same way Christianity brought the Roman Empire on its knees when the disciples of Christ were preaching to the poor why they should stop emphasizing the importance of material things to pursue philosophical ideas.

The perspectives highlighted in this work will aid the rich to see how the UN officials are using this association to pursue their best interests and to disguise wickedness and egoism to make the world insecure in the name of preaching social justice and equality. Most importantly, it will help the rich to reappraise if the teaching that the UN is prompting in the social order could be the biggest threat that is facing them in the aftermath of WW2 and/or if it is helping them to make people be ready to put up with one another, thus converting peace and security into becoming static as per what they were led to believe in 1945 that the UN would help them to achieve.

The objective of the book is to support why the rich should interfere to pause their respective governments from continuing to support the UN remaining an economic operator and to go back to reinstitute the American culture to spare the corruption that the UN subsidiary organs are committing from converting them into a simpler form. This task also means letting the United States take the lead to show us how to mount this American culture, because this country is the only one that has know-how.